| 
 
| While troubleshooting a BGP problem on the Certkiller network you notice that the 10.10.10.0/24 prefix is not being injected into the local BGP table of CK1 . The relevant configuration of router CK1 is shown below: , t% G! B0 N4 p router bgp 650010 S, ?  {; t& S0 N
 network 10.0.0.0  b% b5 r3 r9 a. F! C: m
 neighbor 172.16.1.1 remote-as 65002
 4 W6 {' H: {9 q+ u; R, s6 s6 eno auto-summary
 5 |5 E  k  H7 [/ D, ORouting table information:
 * n" s4 p) ?" G# {$ a8 Nshow ip route | include 10O 10.10.10.0/24 [110/11] via 192.168.1.1, 2d00h,Ethernet0/05 p( n( L+ i  x4 w9 D' j
 Why doesn't the local BGP table have the prefix? ) U9 k5 n3 t: p4 Z: f- l
 A. This route is not a BGP learned route. 3 o) t5 R: q1 G8 {( \' s  l2 x. R
 B. The network command is wrong.
 % ]2 G' r3 W( g0 UC. The 172.16.1.1 neighbor is down. , Z7 V" ?9 i( E2 \. `1 Q9 y
 D. The prefix 10.10.10.0/24 is not a connected route.
 , d& F2 U  H, W- {% h, WAnswer: B
 * p' x  d- O# N* [. p/ j7 N$ Y3 S8 e; [& `6 g0 b! k& w
 我认为选b,是说要把10.10.10.0/24通告进bgp,使用network是错误的。
 . K. v" N& j3 U4 g( h) F 嘿嘿,请指教
 | 
 |